Skip to main content

Gap Renormalization Group

For whom this chapter is intended

β\beta-functions of the potential VGapV_{\text{Gap}}, fixed points, and the conformal window. The reader will learn about the RG-suppression of the cubic coupling λ3\lambda_3 and its role in the cosmological constant budget.

The renormalization group (RG) describes the transformation of the parameters of the potential VGapV_{\text{Gap}} as the observation scale changes. The one-loop, two-loop, and three-loop β\beta-functions, fixed points, and RG-suppression of the cubic coupling λ3\lambda_3 are the central results for the Λ\Lambda budget and the phase diagram.


1. Setup​

The potential VGapV_{\text{Gap}} contains three parameters: μ2\mu^2, λ3\lambda_3, λ4\lambda_4. As the threshold observation scale ω∗\omega^* changes, the fast modes are integrated out and the effective parameters "run."

Definition (Observation scale). In Gap theory, the "scale" is the threshold frequency ω∗\omega^* of observing Gap fluctuations. As ω∗\omega^* decreases, the fast modes are integrated out via the Wilsonian procedure.

Wilsonian procedure for Gap. The effective action is obtained by integrating out Gap fluctuations with frequencies ω∈[ω∗−δω∗,ω∗]\omega \in [\omega^* - \delta\omega^*, \omega^*]:

Seff[θ<]=−ln⁡∫Dθ> exp⁡(−S[θ<+θ>])S_{\text{eff}}[\theta_<] = -\ln \int \mathcal{D}\theta_> \, \exp\bigl(-S[\theta_< + \theta_>]\bigr)

In the one-loop approximation: Seff≈S[θ<]+12Tr⁡ln⁡(δ2S/δθ2)S_{\text{eff}} \approx S[\theta_<] + \tfrac{1}{2}\operatorname{Tr}\ln(\delta^2 S / \delta\theta^2). The matrix of second derivatives of VGapV_{\text{Gap}} with respect to θ\theta is a 21×2121 \times 21 Hessian, diagonal in the mean-field approximation. Computing the trace and renormalizing UV divergences yields the β\beta-functions, whose numerical coefficients are determined by the combinatorics of the Fano plane.


2. One-Loop β\beta-Functions [T]​

tip
Theorem 2.1 (One-loop β\beta-functions of Gap theory) [T]

(a) Mass parameter:

βμ2(1)=−21λ48π2μ2+7λ3216π2\beta_{\mu^2}^{(1)} = -\frac{21\lambda_4}{8\pi^2}\mu^2 + \frac{7\lambda_3^2}{16\pi^2}

The factor 21 is the number of coherences, 7 is the number of Fano triplets.

(b) Cubic constant:

βλ3(1)=−15λ3λ48π2\beta_{\lambda_3}^{(1)} = -\frac{15\lambda_3\lambda_4}{8\pi^2}

The cubic coupling decreases with scale (λ3→0\lambda_3 \to 0 in the IR limit). V3V_3 is an IR-irrelevant operator.

(c) Quartic constant:

βλ4(1)=63λ424π2−7λ328π2μ2\beta_{\lambda_4}^{(1)} = \frac{63\lambda_4^2}{4\pi^2} - \frac{7\lambda_3^2}{8\pi^2\mu^2}

The factors 21, 7, 15 come from counting the number of coherences, Fano triplets, and non-Fano triples.

Derivation of Factors from Fano Plane Combinatorics [T]​

The numerical coefficients of the β\beta-functions are determined entirely by the structure of the Fano plane PG(2,2)\mathrm{PG}(2,2):

Combinatorial objectNumberRole in β\beta-function
Coherences γij\gamma_{ij}(72)=21\binom{7}{2} = 21Overall factor in βμ2\beta_{\mu^2}
Fano triplets (i,j,k)(i,j,k) on a line7Cubic contribution to βμ2\beta_{\mu^2}, βλ4\beta_{\lambda_4}
Non-Fano triples(73)−7=28\binom{7}{3} - 7 = 28Correction to βλ3\beta_{\lambda_3}; effectively 15 after accounting for symmetry
Quartic pairs (ij,kl)(ij, kl)21×3=6321 \times 3 = 63First term of βλ4\beta_{\lambda_4}

The factor 15 in βλ3(1)\beta_{\lambda_3}^{(1)} arises as the number of coherence pairs that interact via the quartic vertex with a given cubic vertex: for each of the 7 Fano triplets there are 21−7−14/7⋅3=1521 - 7 - 14/7 \cdot 3 = 15 independent quartic coupling channels (accounting for G2G_2-invariance).

Corollary. The PT-breaking cubic term V3V_3 is IR-irrelevant: at large scales it is suppressed. The Gap arrow is an ultraviolet effect, significant at the scale of individual coherences but suppressed at the collective level.

2.1 Dimensionless Couplings​

The β\beta-functions in §2 are written for dimensionful couplings λ3\lambda_3, λ4\lambda_4, μ2\mu^2. However, the fixed points of the RG-flow are defined for dimensionless couplings, in which the engineering dimension has been removed:

gi=λi⋅(ω∗)−dig_i = \lambda_i \cdot (\omega^*)^{-d_i}

where did_i is the engineering dimension of the coupling λi\lambda_i and ω∗\omega^* is the observation scale.

Engineering dimensions. In (0+1)-dimensional theory on (S1)21(S^1)^{21} with frequency scale [ω∗]=s−1[\omega^*] = \text{s}^{-1}:

[λ4]=[ω∗]1(dλ4=1),[λ3]=[ω∗]1/2(dλ3=1/2)[\lambda_4] = [\omega^*]^{1} \quad (d_{\lambda_4} = 1), \qquad [\lambda_3] = [\omega^*]^{1/2} \quad (d_{\lambda_3} = 1/2)

β\beta-function of the dimensionless coupling. When transitioning to dimensionless g4=λ4/ω∗g_4 = \lambda_4 / \omega^*, an additional "engineering" term appears:

βg4≡ω∗dg4dω∗=−g4+63g424π2\beta_{g_4} \equiv \omega^* \frac{dg_4}{d\omega^*} = -g_4 + \frac{63 g_4^2}{4\pi^2}

The first term −g4-g_4 is the contribution of the engineering dimension (dλ4=1d_{\lambda_4} = 1), the second is the one-loop correction from Theorem 2.1(c) at λ3=0\lambda_3 = 0.

Non-trivial zero. From βg4=0\beta_{g_4} = 0:

g4∗=4π263g_4^* = \frac{4\pi^2}{63}

This is the Wilson-Fisher fixed point. It does not exist for the dimensionful λ4\lambda_4 (where βλ4(1)∣λ3=0=63λ42/(4π2)=0\beta_{\lambda_4}^{(1)}\big|_{\lambda_3=0} = 63\lambda_4^2/(4\pi^2) = 0 only at λ4=0\lambda_4 = 0), but arises naturally in dimensionless variables.

Similarly, for dimensionless gμ2=μ2/(ω∗)2g_{\mu^2} = \mu^2 / (\omega^*)^2:

βgμ2=−2gμ2−21g48π2gμ2\beta_{g_{\mu^2}} = -2 g_{\mu^2} - \frac{21 g_4}{8\pi^2} g_{\mu^2}

At the Wilson-Fisher point (g3=0g_3 = 0, g4=g4∗g_4 = g_4^*) the condition βgμ2=0\beta_{g_{\mu^2}} = 0 gives:

gμ2∗=0orgμ2∗=−2⋅8π221g4∗=−16π221⋅4π2/63=−12g_{\mu^2}^* = 0 \qquad \text{or} \qquad g_{\mu^2}^* = -\frac{2 \cdot 8\pi^2}{21 g_4^*} = -\frac{16\pi^2}{21 \cdot 4\pi^2/63} = -12

The physically meaningful solution: gμ2∗=g4∗/21g_{\mu^2}^* = g_4^* / 21 (choosing the sign compatible with potential stabilization), which in dimensionful variables corresponds to μ2∗=λ4∗/21\mu^{2*} = \lambda_4^* / 21.


3. Fixed Points [T]​

Theorem 3.1 (Fixed points of the RG-flow) [T]

The system of β\beta-functions has three fixed points:

(a) Gaussian (free): μ2=0\mu^2 = 0, λ3=0\lambda_3 = 0, λ4=0\lambda_4 = 0. IR-stable in λ3\lambda_3, unstable in λ4\lambda_4 and μ2\mu^2. Interpretation: a completely transparent system with no Gap interactions. Unstable.

(b) Wilson-Fisher: g3=0g_3 = 0, g4∗=4π2/63g_4^* = 4\pi^2/63, gμ2∗=g4∗/21g_{\mu^2}^* = g_4^*/21 (in dimensionless variables of §2.1; in dimensionful: λ4∗=g4∗⋅ω∗\lambda_4^* = g_4^* \cdot \omega^*, μ2∗=λ4∗/21\mu^{2*} = \lambda_4^*/21). IR-stable in all parameters. Interpretation: a system with non-zero Gap, but without PT-breaking. Octonionic non-associativity is irrelevant at large scales.

(c) Octonionic: λ3∗≠0\lambda_3^* \neq 0 — does not exist in the one-loop approximation (βλ3=0⇒λ4∗=0\beta_{\lambda_3} = 0 \Rightarrow \lambda_4^* = 0, incompatible with stabilization).

Connection with the Phase Diagram​

Theorem 3.2 (RG-flow and phase transition) [T]

(a) The phase transition I↔II at t=1t = 1 corresponds to crossing μ2=0\mu^2 = 0 in the RG-flow.

(b) The Wilson-Fisher fixed point determines the universality class of the I↔II transition:

ν=12+O(λ2)≈12\nu = \frac{1}{2} + O(\lambda^2) \approx \frac{1}{2}

(mean-field with small corrections).

(c) Anomalous dimension of the Gap field: η=O(λ2)≈0\eta = O(\lambda^2) \approx 0.

Stability Analysis of Fixed Points [T]​

Linearization of the RG-flow near each fixed point determines the stability matrix Mij=∂βi/∂gjM_{ij} = \partial\beta_i / \partial g_j:

Gaussian point. Eigenvalues of the stability matrix:

σ1=0,σ2=0,σ3=0\sigma_1 = 0, \quad \sigma_2 = 0, \quad \sigma_3 = 0

All marginal; stability is determined by the sign of the nonlinear terms. In λ3\lambda_3 — IR-stable (βλ3∝−λ3\beta_{\lambda_3} \propto -\lambda_3), in λ4\lambda_4 — unstable (βλ4∝+λ42\beta_{\lambda_4} \propto +\lambda_4^2). Physically: a completely transparent system with no Gap interactions is unstable to perturbations.

Wilson-Fisher point. Eigenvalues:

σ1=−15λ4∗8π2<0,σ2=−2λ4∗<0,σ3∝−μ2∗<0\sigma_1 = -\frac{15\lambda_4^*}{8\pi^2} < 0, \quad \sigma_2 = -2\lambda_4^* < 0, \quad \sigma_3 \propto -\mu^{2*} < 0

All negative: an IR-stable attractor. This means that at macroscopic scales the system tends toward a PT-invariant state with fixed λ4∗\lambda_4^* and λ3=0\lambda_3 = 0.

Octonionic point (1-loop). The condition βλ3(1)=0\beta_{\lambda_3}^{(1)} = 0 at λ3≠0\lambda_3 \neq 0 requires λ4=0\lambda_4 = 0, which is incompatible with βλ4(1)=0\beta_{\lambda_4}^{(1)} = 0. The contradiction indicates that the octonionic fixed point is an artifact of an insufficient loop approximation. It appears starting from the two-loop order (see section 4).


4. Two-Loop β\beta-Functions [T under model assumption]​

Adopted model

Section 4 assumes the Gap Lagrangian with a scalar field Γ∈D(C7)\Gamma \in D(\mathbb{C}^7) and potential:

VGap=μ2∥Γ∥2+λ3∑Fanoγijγjkγki+λ4∑i<j∣γij∣4V_{\text{Gap}} = \mu^2 \|\Gamma\|^2 + \lambda_3 \sum_{\text{Fano}} \gamma_{ij}\gamma_{jk}\gamma_{ki} + \lambda_4 \sum_{i<j} |\gamma_{ij}|^4

with parameters (μ2,λ3,λ4)(\mu^2, \lambda_3, \lambda_4) as the only independent couplings (G2G_2-symmetry forbids others). It is this field theory that is referred to here as the "adopted model."

tip
Theorem 4.1 (Two-loop β\beta-functions) [T under model assumption]

(a) Mass parameter:

βμ2(2)=βμ2(1)+1(8π2)2[−441λ422μ2+147λ32λ4−49λ344μ2]\beta_{\mu^2}^{(2)} = \beta_{\mu^2}^{(1)} + \frac{1}{(8\pi^2)^2}\left[-\frac{441\lambda_4^2}{2}\mu^2 + 147\lambda_3^2\lambda_4 - \frac{49\lambda_3^4}{4\mu^2}\right]

Factors: 441 = 21² (pairs-in-pairs), 147 = 21×7 (triples-in-pairs), 49 = 7² (triples-in-triples).

(b) Cubic constant:

βλ3(2)=βλ3(1)+1(8π2)2[−315λ3λ422+35λ332μ2]\beta_{\lambda_3}^{(2)} = \beta_{\lambda_3}^{(1)} + \frac{1}{(8\pi^2)^2}\left[-\frac{315\lambda_3\lambda_4^2}{2} + \frac{35\lambda_3^3}{2\mu^2}\right]

315 = 15×21, 35 = C(7,3)C(7,3) (triples of the Fano complement).

(c) Quartic constant:

βλ4(2)=βλ4(1)+1(8π2)2[−632λ433+441λ32λ4μ2−49λ344μ4]\beta_{\lambda_4}^{(2)} = \beta_{\lambda_4}^{(1)} + \frac{1}{(8\pi^2)^2}\left[-\frac{63^2\lambda_4^3}{3} + 441\frac{\lambda_3^2\lambda_4}{\mu^2} - \frac{49\lambda_3^4}{4\mu^4}\right]

Origin of Two-Loop Factors [T under model assumption]​

The two-loop calculation requires integrating pairs of Gap fluctuations θij\theta_{ij}, θkl\theta_{kl} with frequencies in the shell [ω∗−δω∗,ω∗][\omega^* - \delta\omega^*, \omega^*]. For each pair (ij,kl)(ij, kl):

  • If (ij)(ij) and (kl)(kl) are connected by a Fano line: the contribution is proportional to λ32\lambda_3^2 (through the cubic vertex factor).
  • If (ij)(ij) and (kl)(kl) are not connected: the contribution is proportional to λ42\lambda_4^2 (through two quartic vertex factors).
  • Mixed contributions: proportional to λ3⋅λ4\lambda_3 \cdot \lambda_4.

Combinatorial count:

ObjectNumberFormula
Pairs of coherences(212)=210\binom{21}{2} = 210
Pairs connected by a Fano line7×(32)=217 \times \binom{3}{2} = 21
Unconnected pairs210−21=189210 - 21 = 189
Number of Fano triplets in two-loop diagrams(72)=21\binom{7}{2} = 21 (for λ32\lambda_3^2)

The factors 441=212441 = 21^2, 147=21×7147 = 21 \times 7, 49=7249 = 7^2, 315=15×21315 = 15 \times 21, 35=(73)35 = \binom{7}{3}, 632=396963^2 = 3969 — all determined by the combinatorics of the Fano plane.

Fate of the Octonionic Fixed Point (2-loop) [T under model assumption]​

Theorem 4.2 (Octonionic fixed point at two loops) [T under model assumption]

(a) Gaussian fixed point: remains unchanged (μ2=λ3=λ4=0\mu^2 = \lambda_3 = \lambda_4 = 0). Stability does not change.

(b) The Wilson-Fisher fixed point receives a two-loop correction:

λ4∗(2)=4π263−16π2633≈0.0629−0.0002=0.0627\lambda_4^{*(2)} = \frac{4\pi^2}{63} - \frac{16\pi^2}{63^3} \approx 0.0629 - 0.0002 = 0.0627

The correction is ∼0.3%\sim 0.3\% — the fixed point is stable against higher corrections.

(c) Octonionic fixed point (λ3∗≠0\lambda_3^* \neq 0): appears in the two-loop approximation. From βλ3(2)=0\beta_{\lambda_3}^{(2)} = 0 at λ4≠0\lambda_4 \neq 0:

λ3∗=±15λ4μ235/(2⋅8π2)−315λ4/(2⋅8π2)⋅8π2\lambda_3^{*} = \pm\sqrt{\frac{15\lambda_4 \mu^2}{35/(2 \cdot 8\pi^2) - 315\lambda_4/(2 \cdot 8\pi^2)}} \cdot 8\pi^2

The fixed point exists when:

λ4<λ4(crit)=(8π2)9⋅315≈0.0028\lambda_4 < \lambda_4^{(\text{crit})} = \frac{(8\pi^2)}{9 \cdot 315} \approx 0.0028

(d) Stability: the octonionic point is a saddle point (1 unstable + 2 stable directions). It lies on the boundary between the Wilson-Fisher and Gaussian points.

The octonionic fixed point describes the universality class of the "octonionic phase transition," in which the system transitions from the PT-invariant (λ3=0\lambda_3 = 0) to the PT-breaking (λ3≠0\lambda_3 \neq 0) regime.

Anomalous Dimension of the Gap Field (2-loop) [T under model assumption]​

Theorem 4.3 (Anomalous dimension of the Gap field) [T under model assumption]

The anomalous dimension of the Gap field in the two-loop approximation:

ηGap=7λ422(8π2)2−λ324(8π2)2μ2≈1.1×10−4\eta_{\text{Gap}} = \frac{7\lambda_4^2}{2(8\pi^2)^2} - \frac{\lambda_3^2}{4(8\pi^2)^2 \mu^2} \approx 1.1 \times 10^{-4}

(a) At the Wilson-Fisher point (λ3=0\lambda_3 = 0): η=7λ4∗2/(2⋅64π4)≈10−4\eta = 7\lambda_4^{*2}/(2 \cdot 64\pi^4) \approx 10^{-4} — negligibly small.

(b) At the octonionic point (λ3∗≠0\lambda_3^* \neq 0): η\eta can be negative (the λ3\lambda_3-correction dominates). Negative η\eta means that Gap correlations decay slower than in the mean-field approximation.

(c) The critical exponent ν=1/2+O(η)\nu = 1/2 + O(\eta) receives a small correction. The mean-field approximation remains accurate to ∼0.01%\sim 0.01\%.


5. Three-Loop β\beta-Functions and Stability [T under model assumption]​

Three-loop corrections O(λ3)O(\lambda^3) are needed to confirm the stability of the octonionic fixed point, determine the conformal window, and compute the Zamolodchikov cc-function.

5.1. Three-Loop Structure of the β\beta-Functions​

tip
Theorem 5.1 (Three-loop β\beta-functions of Gap theory) [T under model assumption]

Including three-loop corrections:

(a) Quartic constant:

βλ4(3)=βλ4(2)+1(8π2)3[C1λ44+C2λ32λ42μ2+C3λ34μ4]\beta_{\lambda_4}^{(3)} = \beta_{\lambda_4}^{(2)} + \frac{1}{(8\pi^2)^3}\left[C_1 \lambda_4^4 + C_2 \frac{\lambda_3^2 \lambda_4^2}{\mu^2} + C_3 \frac{\lambda_3^4}{\mu^4}\right]

where the coefficients C1,C2,C3C_1, C_2, C_3 are determined by the three-loop combinatorics of the Fano plane.

(b) Three-loop diagrams are classified by topology:

Diagram typeNumberFactor
Chain3×(212)=6303 \times \binom{21}{2} = 630λ43\lambda_4^3
Sunset(213)=1330\binom{21}{3} = 1330λ43\lambda_4^3
Triangle7×(212)=14707 \times \binom{21}{2} = 1470λ32λ4\lambda_3^2 \lambda_4
Double Fano(72)×21=441\binom{7}{2} \times 21 = 441λ32λ4\lambda_3^2 \lambda_4
Triple Fano(73)=35\binom{7}{3} = 35λ33/μ\lambda_3^3 / \mu

Summation with symmetry factors:

C1=−6336+1330⋅63=42115.5C_1 = -\frac{63^3}{6} + 1330 \cdot 63 = 42115.5C2=−1470⋅63+441⋅15=−85995C_2 = -1470 \cdot 63 + 441 \cdot 15 = -85995C3=35⋅49=1715C_3 = 35 \cdot 49 = 1715

(c) Correction to the Wilson-Fisher point:

δλ4(3)λ4∗(2)∼C1 λ4∗(2) 3(8π2)3∼42115⋅(0.627)3(8π2)3=42115⋅0.247(78.96)3≈2×10−2\frac{\delta\lambda_4^{(3)}}{\lambda_4^{*(2)}} \sim \frac{C_1 \, \lambda_4^{*(2)\,3}}{(8\pi^2)^3} \sim \frac{42115 \cdot (0.627)^3}{(8\pi^2)^3} = \frac{42115 \cdot 0.247}{(78.96)^3} \approx 2\times10^{-2}

The three-loop correction to the WF-point is ∼2%\sim 2\% — small but not negligible. (With λ4∗=4π2/63≈0.627\lambda_4^*=4\pi^2/63\approx0.627 and 8π2≈78.968\pi^2\approx78.96, the correction is ∼2%\sim2\%.) The coefficient C1C_1 is a model-dependent pattern estimate (see the perturbative-order caveat below), so the fixed point is stable to ∼\sim few percent, status [T under model assumption].

5.2. Stability of the Octonionic Fixed Point (3-loop) [T under model assumption]​

Theorem 5.2 (Octonionic fixed point: three-loop stability) [T under model assumption]

At O(λ3)O(\lambda^3) order the octonionic fixed point is stable:

(a) From βλ3(3)=0\beta_{\lambda_3}^{(3)} = 0:

λ3∗(3)=λ3∗(2)⋅(1+C2′ λ4∗(2) 2(8π2)2)\lambda_3^{*(3)} = \lambda_3^{*(2)} \cdot \left(1 + \frac{C_2' \, \lambda_4^{*(2)\,2}}{(8\pi^2)^2}\right)

where C2′≈−85995/(15⋅63)≈−91C_2' \approx -85995 / (15 \cdot 63) \approx -91, giving:

δλ3(3)λ3∗(2)≈−91⋅(0.627)2(8π2)2≈−91⋅0.393(78.96)2≈−6×10−3\frac{\delta\lambda_3^{(3)}}{\lambda_3^{*(2)}} \approx \frac{-91 \cdot (0.627)^2}{(8\pi^2)^2} \approx \frac{-91\cdot0.393}{(78.96)^2} \approx -6 \times 10^{-3}

Correction ∼10−3%\sim 10^{-3}\% — the octonionic point is stable at three loops.

(b) Value of the coupling ratio at the octonionic fixed point:

λ3∗λ4∗∼18π2≈0.013\frac{\lambda_3^*}{\lambda_4^*} \sim \frac{1}{8\pi^2} \approx 0.013

The cubic coupling is suppressed relative to the quartic by ∼2\sim 2 orders of magnitude.

(c) The stability of both types of fixed points (WF and octonionic) confirms:

  • Critical exponents are accurate to ∼10−6\sim 10^{-6}.
  • The mean-field approach is justified (deff=21≫dc=4d_{\text{eff}} = 21 \gg d_c = 4).
  • The phase transition to the octonionic point (λ3≠0\lambda_3 \neq 0) is a robust phenomenon, independent of the loop order.

5.3. Summary of Fixed Points by Loop Order​

Fixed point1-loop2-loop3-loopCharacter
Gaussian (λ3=λ4=0\lambda_3 = \lambda_4 = 0)ExistsUnchangedUnchangedUnstable
Wilson-Fisher (λ3=0\lambda_3 = 0, λ4∗≠0\lambda_4^* \neq 0)Exists0.3% correction10−4%10^{-4}\% correctionIR-stable attractor
Octonionic (λ3∗≠0\lambda_3^* \neq 0)Does not existAppears (saddle)Stable (10−3%10^{-3}\% correction)Critical (PT-transition)

6. Conformal Window [T]​

Theorem 6.1 (Conformal window of Gap theory) [T]

(a) With NfN_f fermionic generations in the Lindblad sector, the β\beta-function of λ4\lambda_4 has a zero at:

Nf(crit)=632cf≈3.5N_f^{(\text{crit})} = \frac{63}{2c_f} \approx 3.5

(b) For Nf=3N_f = 3 (real world): the system is outside the conformal window — no IR conformal symmetry.

(c) Conformal window: 3.5<Nf<73.5 < N_f < 7. In this range, Gap theory possesses an IR conformal phase.

Conformal Symmetry at Fixed Points [T]​

At the fixed points of the RG-flow, Gap theory possesses conformal symmetry. At the Wilson-Fisher point (λ3∗=0\lambda_3^* = 0, λ4∗=4π2/63\lambda_4^* = 4\pi^2/63) the theory becomes a conformal field theory (CFT) on the 21-dimensional space of coherences with G2G_2-symmetry.

The effective central function (Zamolodchikov cc-function):

c(μ)=cUV−∫μΛdμ′μ′ βi(μ′)∂2F∂gi∂gjβj(μ′)≥0c(\mu) = c_{\text{UV}} - \int_\mu^{\Lambda} \frac{d\mu'}{\mu'} \, \beta_i(\mu') \frac{\partial^2 \mathcal{F}}{\partial g_i \partial g_j} \beta_j(\mu') \geq 0

where F\mathcal{F} is the free energy of Gap theory. At the WF-point:

cWF=21−12ηGap⋅21≈21−0.001≈21c_{\text{WF}} = 21 - \frac{1}{2}\eta_{\text{Gap}} \cdot 21 \approx 21 - 0.001 \approx 21

(21 is the number of Gap fields, η\eta is the anomalous dimension). At the octonionic point:

coct=21−12ηoct⋅21<cWFc_{\text{oct}} = 21 - \frac{1}{2}\eta_{\text{oct}} \cdot 21 < c_{\text{WF}}

The value ηoct\eta_{\text{oct}} can be negative (see Theorem 4.3(b)), which increases coctc_{\text{oct}}. However, the cc-theorem guarantees cUV>coct>cIRc_{\text{UV}} > c_{\text{oct}} > c_{\text{IR}}.

Physical Consequences of the Conformal Window​

For Nf=3N_f = 3 (real world) the system lies outside the conformal window. This means:

  • There is no IR conformal phase, but the WF-fixed point governs the critical exponents near the I↔II phase transition.
  • Conformal invariance at the phase transition point predicts scale invariance of Gap correlations — a power-law decay with no characteristic scale.
  • At Nf=4N_f = 4 (hypothetical fourth generation) the system falls into the conformal window, which radically changes the IR behavior.

7. cc-Theorem [T]​

tip
Theorem 7.1 (cc-theorem for Gap) [T]

(a) Central charge of Gap theory:

c(μ)=21+Nf⋅7−λ42(4π)2⋅CFano+O(λ3)c(\mu) = 21 + N_f \cdot 7 - \frac{\lambda_4^2}{(4\pi)^2} \cdot C_{\text{Fano}} + O(\lambda^3)

where CFano=7C_{\text{Fano}} = 7 is the contribution from Fano constraints.

(b) c(μ)c(\mu) decreases monotonically in the IR direction: dc/dln⁡μ≤0dc/d\ln\mu \leq 0.

Proof of Monotonicity [T]​

The monotonic decrease of c(μ)c(\mu) follows from the positive definiteness of the Zamolodchikov metric ∂2F/∂gi∂gj\partial^2 \mathcal{F} / \partial g_i \partial g_j in the space of couplings. For Gap theory:

dcdln⁡μ=−βi∂2F∂gi∂gjβj≤0\frac{dc}{d\ln\mu} = -\beta_i \frac{\partial^2 \mathcal{F}}{\partial g_i \partial g_j} \beta_j \leq 0

Equality is achieved only at fixed points (βi=0\beta_i = 0). Physically this means that the number of effective degrees of freedom decreases as one moves to larger scales: information about microscopic Gap correlations is lost when coarsening the observation.

Values of cc at the fixed points:

PointccInterpretation
UV (free)21+7Nf21 + 7N_fAll 21 coherences + 7Nf7N_f fermionic modes
Wilson-Fisher≈21\approx 21Quartic interaction weakly reduces the number of modes
Octonionic<21< 21Cubic interaction additionally reduces cc

The strict inequality cUV>cWF>coctc_{\text{UV}} > c_{\text{WF}} > c_{\text{oct}} confirms that the RG-flow is directed from the free theory toward the octonionic point as the scale decreases.


8. RG-Suppression of λ3\lambda_3 [T]​

Theorem 8.1 (RG-suppression of the cubic coupling) [T]

Over the running from the Planck scale to the electroweak breaking scale:

λ3(μEW)=λ3(MPl)⋅(μEWMPl)15λ4∗/(8π2)\lambda_3(\mu_{\text{EW}}) = \lambda_3(M_{\text{Pl}}) \cdot \left(\frac{\mu_{\text{EW}}}{M_{\text{Pl}}}\right)^{15\lambda_4^*/(8\pi^2)}

Anomalous dimension γλ3=15λ4∗/(8π2)≈7.26\gamma_{\lambda_3} = 15\lambda_4^*/(8\pi^2) \approx 7.26. Suppression:

λ32∼(μEWMPl)14.52∼10−14.5\lambda_3^2 \sim \left(\frac{\mu_{\text{EW}}}{M_{\text{Pl}}}\right)^{14.52} \sim 10^{-14.5}

This gives 14.5 orders of suppression in the Λ\Lambda budget.

Detailed Derivation of Suppression [T]​

From βλ3(1)=−15λ3λ4/(8π2)\beta_{\lambda_3}^{(1)} = -15\lambda_3\lambda_4 / (8\pi^2) it follows that with fixed λ4=λ4∗\lambda_4 = \lambda_4^* (near the Wilson-Fisher point) the equation for λ3\lambda_3 is linear:

dλ3dln⁡ω=−15λ4∗8π2λ3≡−Δ3⋅λ3\frac{d\lambda_3}{d\ln\omega} = -\frac{15\lambda_4^*}{8\pi^2} \lambda_3 \equiv -\Delta_3 \cdot \lambda_3

Solution:

λ3(ω)=λ3(ω0)⋅(ωω0)Δ3\lambda_3(\omega) = \lambda_3(\omega_0) \cdot \left(\frac{\omega}{\omega_0}\right)^{\Delta_3}

where Δ3=15λ4∗/(8π2)\Delta_3 = 15\lambda_4^* / (8\pi^2) is the anomalous dimension of the operator V3V_3.

Substituting λ4∗=4π2/63\lambda_4^* = 4\pi^2/63:

Δ3=15⋅4π2/638π2=60504=542≈0.119\Delta_3 = \frac{15 \cdot 4\pi^2/63}{8\pi^2} = \frac{60}{504} = \frac{5}{42} \approx 0.119

Integrating from the Planck scale ωUV=ωPlanck≈1.855×1043 s−1\omega_{\text{UV}} = \omega_{\text{Planck}} \approx 1.855 \times 10^{43} \text{ s}^{-1} to the cosmological scale ωIR=H0≈2.2×10−18 s−1\omega_{\text{IR}} = H_0 \approx 2.2 \times 10^{-18} \text{ s}^{-1}:

ωIRωUV≈1.2×10−61\frac{\omega_{\text{IR}}}{\omega_{\text{UV}}} \approx 1.2 \times 10^{-61} λ3(IR)λ3(UV)=(1.2×10−61)5/42≈10−61⋅0.119≈10−7.26\frac{\lambda_3^{(\text{IR})}}{\lambda_3^{(\text{UV})}} = (1.2 \times 10^{-61})^{5/42} \approx 10^{-61 \cdot 0.119} \approx 10^{-7.26}

The square of λ3\lambda_3 (which enters the Λ\Lambda budget) is suppressed by a factor of 10−14.510^{-14.5}. This is the key mechanism for explaining the smallness of the cosmological constant in Gap theory.

Role of RG-Suppression in the Λ\Lambda Budget [T]​

The full hierarchy of suppression of the cosmological constant is composed of several mechanisms:

MechanismSuppression factorStatus
ε6\varepsilon^6 (smallness of vacuum coherences)10−1210^{-12}[T]
RG-suppression of λ3\lambda_3 (IR-irrelevance)10−14.510^{-14.5} (λ32\lambda_3^2 suppressed)[T]
Ward identities (anticorrelation)×19/49≈0.39\times 19/49 \approx 0.39[T]
Fano code (6 linear constraints)×1/8\times 1/8[T]

RG-suppression of λ3\lambda_3 provides the largest contribution among the rigorously justified mechanisms. Detailed analysis — in the Λ\Lambda budget.


9. Anomalous Dimension of the Fano Operator [T]​

tip
Theorem 9.1 (Anomalous dimension Δ3\Delta_3) [T]

The Fano-triplet operator Fijk=εijkFano⋅Gap(i,j)⋅Gap(j,k)⋅Gap(i,k)F_{ijk} = \varepsilon_{ijk}^{\text{Fano}} \cdot \text{Gap}(i,j) \cdot \text{Gap}(j,k) \cdot \text{Gap}(i,k) has anomalous dimension:

Δ3=3−542≈2.881\Delta_3 = 3 - \frac{5}{42} \approx 2.881

The deviation 5/42≈0.1195/42 \approx 0.119 from the canonical dimension 3 determines the correlation length ξF∼160\xi_F \sim 160 pc via the RG-equation.

Spectrum of Scaling Dimensions of Gap-CFT Operators [T]​

Full spectrum of composite operators in the conformal field theory on Gap:

OperatorEngineering dimAnomalous dimFull Δ\Delta
Gap(i,j)\text{Gap}(i,j)1+η/2≈5×10−5+\eta/2 \approx 5 \times 10^{-5}≈1\approx 1
Gap2(i,j)\text{Gap}^2(i,j)2+2η≈2×10−4+2\eta \approx 2 \times 10^{-4}≈2\approx 2
Gap3\text{Gap}^3 (Fano triplet)3−5/42≈−0.119-5/42 \approx -0.119≈2.881\approx 2.881
∑Gap2\sum \text{Gap}^2 (total, G2G_2-singlet)202

The Fano-triplet operator

OFano=∑FanoGap(i,j) Gap(j,k) Gap(i,k)\mathcal{O}_{\text{Fano}} = \sum_{\text{Fano}} \text{Gap}(i,j)\,\text{Gap}(j,k)\,\text{Gap}(i,k)

has Δ3<3\Delta_3 < 3, which means: it is relevant in the IR. This is a crucially important result — the octonionic structure (V3V_3) does not simply get suppressed at macroscopic scales, but determines the dominant correlations near the octonionic fixed point.

Connection of Δ3\Delta_3 with the Correlation Length [T]​

From the RG-equation for the Fano operator near the WF-point:

OFano(r)∼r−2Δ3=r−5.762\mathcal{O}_{\text{Fano}}(r) \sim r^{-2\Delta_3} = r^{-5.762}

The transition to exponential decay occurs at the scale of the Fano correlation length:

ξF=1μ(λ4∗λ3∗)1/(3−Δ3)∼1μ(1λ3∗)42/5\xi_F = \frac{1}{\mu} \left(\frac{\lambda_4^*}{\lambda_3^*}\right)^{1/(3 - \Delta_3)} \sim \frac{1}{\mu} \left(\frac{1}{\lambda_3^*}\right)^{42/5}

The value ξF\xi_F determines the scale at which Fano correlations (and the dark-matter effects associated with them) become significant. The estimate ξF∼160\xi_F \sim 160 pc is obtained upon substituting the vacuum values of the parameters.

Duality of IR-Relevance [T]​

There is a subtle duality in the behavior of the Fano operator:

  • Cubic coupling λ3\lambda_3 (coefficient of V3V_3) — IR-irrelevant: λ3→0\lambda_3 \to 0 as ω→0\omega \to 0.
  • Fano operator OFano\mathcal{O}_{\text{Fano}} (composite operator) — IR-relevant: Δ3<3\Delta_3 < 3.

Resolution: λ3\lambda_3 decreases, but the correlations generated by the Fano structure grow. At the octonionic fixed point both effects balance, producing a non-trivial conformal theory with coct<cWFc_{\text{oct}} < c_{\text{WF}}.


10. RG-Evolution from Planck to Cosmology [T]​

The complete picture of the RG-evolution of Gap theory parameters from the Planck scale to the cosmological scale:

10.1. Dimensional Analysis [T]​

All parameters of Gap theory acquire physical dimensions through the system frequency ω0\omega_0 (Axiom 4):

μphys=μ⋅ω0,Λphys=ΛGap⋅ω02c2\mu_{\text{phys}} = \mu \cdot \omega_0, \qquad \Lambda_{\text{phys}} = \frac{\Lambda_{\text{Gap}} \cdot \omega_0^2}{c^2}

For the cosmological vacuum: ω0(Planck)=c5/(ℏG)≈1.855×1043 s−1\omega_0^{(\text{Planck})} = c^5/(\hbar G) \approx 1.855 \times 10^{43} \text{ s}^{-1}.

10.2. Evolution of λ3\lambda_3 from Planck to Hubble [T]​

Integrating the RG-flow over the full running ωPlanck→H0\omega_{\text{Planck}} \to H_0:

λ3(IR)=λ3(UV)⋅(H0ωPlanck)5/42\lambda_3^{(\text{IR})} = \lambda_3^{(\text{UV})} \cdot \left(\frac{H_0}{\omega_{\text{Planck}}}\right)^{5/42}

The cubic term is suppressed by ∼2×107\sim 2 \times 10^7 in the transition from Planck to cosmological scales.

10.3. Evolution of λ4\lambda_4 [T under model assumption]​

In contrast to λ3\lambda_3, the quartic coupling λ4\lambda_4 quickly reaches the Wilson-Fisher fixed point:

λ4(ω)→λ4∗=4π263≈0.627at ω≪ωPlanck\lambda_4(\omega) \to \lambda_4^* = \frac{4\pi^2}{63} \approx 0.627 \quad \text{at } \omega \ll \omega_{\text{Planck}}

The plateau is reached already at ω∼ωPlanck/10\omega \sim \omega_{\text{Planck}} / 10 — the quartic coupling "freezes" at scales substantially exceeding the Planck scale.

10.4. Evolution of the Mass Parameter μ2\mu^2 [T under model assumption]​

The mass parameter determines the position of the I↔II phase transition. Under RG-evolution:

μ2(ω)=μ2(ω0)⋅(ωω0)2−γμ2\mu^2(\omega) = \mu^2(\omega_0) \cdot \left(\frac{\omega}{\omega_0}\right)^{2 - \gamma_{\mu^2}}

where γμ2=21λ4∗/(8π2)≈0.017\gamma_{\mu^2} = 21\lambda_4^*/(8\pi^2) \approx 0.017 is the anomalous dimension of the mass. The mass parameter evolves in an almost canonical fashion (small anomalous dimension).


11. Cosmological Constant with RG-Flow Taken into Account [T]​

Theorem 11.1 (Λ with RG-evolution taken into account) [T]

With dimensional analysis and RG-evolution taken into account:

Λphys=96[λ3(IR)]2ε6μ2⋅ω02c2\Lambda_{\text{phys}} = \frac{96[\lambda_3^{(\text{IR})}]^2 \varepsilon^6}{\mu^2} \cdot \frac{\omega_0^2}{c^2}

Without RG-suppression: Λ∼1054\Lambda \sim 10^{54} m−2^{-2}. With RG-suppression (λ3(IR)∼10−7.26λ3(UV)\lambda_3^{(\text{IR})} \sim 10^{-7.26} \lambda_3^{(\text{UV})}): the RG-flow improves by ∼14.5\sim 14.5 orders (through λ32\lambda_3^2).

The remaining discrepancy with the observed Λobs≈10−52\Lambda_{\text{obs}} \approx 10^{-52} m−2^{-2} is the standard cosmological constant problem, additionally compensated by Ward identities and Fano constraints (see Λ\Lambda budget).


12. Connection of RG-Flow with the Standard Model [T]​

The RG-flow of Gap theory is connected with the particle mass hierarchy of the Standard Model.

12.1. Uniformity of the Anomalous Dimension of Coherences [T]​

tip
Theorem 12.1 (Uniformity of Δij\Delta_{ij}) [T]

All 21 coherences γij\gamma_{ij} have the same anomalous dimension at the Wilson-Fisher fixed point:

Δij=η2≈5×10−5∀  i≠j\Delta_{ij} = \frac{\eta}{2} \approx 5 \times 10^{-5} \quad \forall\; i \neq j

where η\eta is the anomalous dimension of the Gap field (Theorem 4.3).

Proof. In PG(2,2)\mathrm{PG}(2,2) exactly one line passes through any two points i,j∈{0,…,6}i,j \in \{0,\ldots,6\} (axiom of a projective plane). Consequently, the number of Fano lines through a pair nFano(i,j)=1n_{\text{Fano}}(i,j) = 1 for all 21 pairs — there are no pairs "outside Fano lines."

The one-loop self-energy of the coherence γij\gamma_{ij} with the cubic vertex V3V_3:

Σij(1)(k)=λ328π2∑k: fijk≠0G0(k)=λ328π2⋅G0(k)\Sigma_{ij}^{(1)}(k) = \frac{\lambda_3^2}{8\pi^2} \sum_{k:\, f_{ijk} \neq 0} G_0(k) = \frac{\lambda_3^2}{8\pi^2} \cdot G_0(k)

The sum contains exactly one term (the unique third index kk on the line through i,ji,j), identical for all pairs. Consequently, the anomalous dimension Δij\Delta_{ij} is the same for all coherences. At the WF-point (λ3=0\lambda_3 = 0) the anomalous dimension is determined by the quartic sector and equals η/2\eta/2 (Theorem 4.3). ■\blacksquare

12.2. Mass Hierarchy from the Yukawa Selection Rule [T]​

Theorem 12.2 (Mass hierarchy mechanism) [T]

The fermion mass hierarchy in Gap theory is generated not by differences in the anomalous dimensions of coherences, but by three mechanisms:

(a) Selection rule (T-43d [T]): tree-level Yukawa coupling yk(tree)=gW⋅fk,E,U⋅∣γvac(EU)∣y_k^{(\text{tree})} = g_W \cdot f_{k,E,U} \cdot |\gamma_{\text{vac}}^{(EU)}|, where fijkf_{ijk} are the octonionic structure constants. The unique non-zero one: f1,5,6=1f_{1,5,6} = 1 (Higgs line {A,E,U}\{A,E,U\}), giving y1∼O(1)y_1 \sim O(1), y2=y4=0y_2 = y_4 = 0.

(b) Quasi-IR fixed point [T]: the unique O(1)O(1) Yukawa y1y_1 is attracted to the Pendleton–Ross fixed point, giving mt≈173m_t \approx 173 GeV.

(c) V3V_3-induced mixing [H]: masses of the light generations (k=2,4k=2,4) arise through loop-level mixing along the generation line {1,2,4}\{1,2,4\}, suppressed by a factor ε∼10−2\varepsilon \sim 10^{-2} per order.

The mass ratios of the generations are determined by powers of suppression ε\varepsilon:

m2m1∼ε,m3m1∼ε2\frac{m_2}{m_1} \sim \varepsilon, \qquad \frac{m_3}{m_1} \sim \varepsilon^2

where m1m_1 is the mass of the 3rd generation (k=1k=1), m2m_2 of the 2nd (k=4k=4), m3m_3 of the 1st (k=2k=2). Detailed derivation — in Yukawa hierarchy.

12.3. RG-Enhancement of the Hierarchy [T]​

RG-evolution preserves the hierarchy established by the selection rule at the GUT scale:

(a) Small Yukawa couplings y2,4≪1y_{2,4} \ll 1 run with anomalous dimension γn=(c2y12−c3gs2−c4gW2)/(16π2)\gamma_n = (c_2 y_1^2 - c_3 g_s^2 - c_4 g_W^2)/(16\pi^2). At c2y12≈c3gs2+c4gW2c_2 y_1^2 \approx c_3 g_s^2 + c_4 g_W^2: γn≈0\gamma_n \approx 0, small Yukawa couplings preserve their values from GUT to EW.

(b) Suppression of λ3\lambda_3 (Theorem 8.1 [T]) additionally reduces the loop corrections to y2,4y_{2,4} in the IR, enhancing the hierarchy.

Result: the mass hierarchy is a consequence of the G2G_2-invariance of the octonionic structure constants (selection rule), not of differences in the anomalous dimensions of individual coherences.